Home Activities Publications AMAN's Program About AMAN Contact us

 

Combating Corruption

What is Corruption
Free Access to Information
UN Convention Against Corruption
Reforming in Security Forces
Judgment Authority
Code of Conducts
Laws
Corruption Files
 
 

AMAN's Program

Transparent in Public Sector
Free Access to Information
Media and Combating Corruption
Local Governance
Transparency In Private Sector
Summer Camps
NAZAHA Project
   
   

International Issues

Corruption in Politics
Corruption in Public Contracting
Access to Information
Corruption in Education
International Anti-Corruption
Conventions
   
   

TI Research

National Integrity Systems Country Studies
CORIS - Corruption Online  Research & Information System
Global Corruption Report
TI Source Book
   

 


Transparency
 International

 

 


 

TI Bripe Payers Index 2006...

 
 
 
Overseas bribery by companies from the world’s export giants is still common, despite the existence of international anti-bribery laws criminalising this practice, according to the Transparency International 2006 Bribe Payers Index (BPI), the most comprehensive survey of its kind to date.
The BPI looks at the propensity of companies from 30 leading exporting countries to bribe abroad. Companies from the wealthiest countries generally rank in the top half of the Index, but still routinely pay bribes, particularly in developing economies. Companies from emerging export powers India, China and Russia rank among the worst. In the case of China and other emerging export powers, efforts to strengthen domestic anti-corruption activities have failed to extend abroad.

“Bribing companies are actively undermining the best efforts of governments in developing nations to improve governance, and thereby driving the vicious cycle of poverty,” said Transparency International Chair Huguette Labelle.

Respondents from lower income countries in Africa, for example, identified French and Italian companies as among the worst perpetrators.

“It is hypocritical that OECD-based companies continue to bribe across the globe, while their governments pay lip-service to enforcing the law. TI’s Bribe Payers Index indicates that they are not doing enough to clamp down on overseas bribery,” said David Nussbaum, Chief Executive of Transparency International. “The enforcement record on international anti-bribery laws makes for short and disheartening reading.”

“The rules and tools for governments and companies do exist,” said Nussbaum. ”Domestic legislation has been introduced in many countries following the adoption of the UN and OECD anti-corruption conventions, but there are still major problems of implementation and enforcement.”

 

TI Bripe Payers Index 2006: the rankings  
Rank Country/ territory Average score
(0-10)
Percentage of global exports (2005) Ratification of OECD convention Ratification of UNCAC
1 Switzerland 7.81 1.2 X  
2 Sweden 7.62 1.3 X  
3 Australia 7.59 1.0 X X
4 Austria 7.50 0.5 X X
5 Canada 7.46 3.5 X  
6 UK 7.39 3.6 X X
7 Gemany 7.34 9.5 X  
8 Netherlands 7.28 3.4 X  
9 Belgium 7.22 3.3 X  
  US 7.22 8.9 X  
11 Japan 7.10 5.8 X  
12 Singapore 6.78 2.2    
13 Spain 6.63 1.9 X X
14 UAE 6.62 1.1    
15 France 6.50 4.3 X X
16 Portugal 6.47 0.3 X  
17 Mexico 6.45 2.1 X X
18 Hong Kong 6.01 2.8    
  Israel 6.01 0.4    
20 Italy 5.94 3.6 X  
21 South Korea 5.83 2.8 X  
22 Saudi Arabia 5.75 1.8    
23 Brazil 5.65 1.2 X X
24 South Africa 5.61 0.5    
25 Malaysia 5.59 1.4    
26 Taiwan 5.41 1.9    
27 Turkey 5.23 0.7 X  
28 Russia 5.16 2.4   X
29 China 4.94 5.5   X
30 India 4.62 0.9    
 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
Copyright 2006 . All rights reserved. AMAN Coalition