|
November
7, 2006

A report entitled
“Separation between Branches of the Government
in the Palestinian Political System” stressed
the necessity for modifying the Palestinian
Basic Law to bestow equal authority to the three
branches so that one does not overrule the
other.
The report which was prepared by
AMAN in cooperation with MUWATIN called on
drafting a law that would regulate the work of
the Palestinian Cabinet in relation with the
President’s Office.
This report was presented in a
workshop organized by the Palestinian Coalition
for Accountability and Integrity--AMAN. The
workshop was attended by members of the
Palestinian Legislative Council, experts, CSOs’
representatives, and members of the press.
During this workshop, Dr. Azmi
Shuaibi warned that the absence of a clear and
balanced separation between the branches of the
government, the lack of an effective monitoring
system among them, and the empowerment of one
branch over the other helps to constitute a
suitable environment for corruption.
He reiterated that a clear and
balanced separation in the branches of the
government and the presence of an effective
monitoring system are prerequisites for reform.
He noted here that AMAN had worked hard on
producing numerous analytical reports and legal
studies towards this end.
He clarified that the absence of
a law that specifies the mandates of each the
president’s office and the cabinet had
complicated the Palestinian political system
making it clear that such a law should exist.
He also emphasized the three
elements necessary in minimizing corruption in
the public sector institutions; the integrity of
the employees and the institution they work at,
the transparency of procedures followed at
institutions, and the existence of an
accountability system to which an institution is
subjected.
Mr. Jihad Harb, one of the
researchers contracted by AMAN to produce the
report noted that the legislative amendment of
the Basic Law in 2003 which issued the
establishment of the Prime Minister’s Office and
the transfer of most of the executive powers to
it, had marked an important step towards the
separation between the branches of government in
the Palestinian political system. According to
this law the Prime Minister is held accountable
to the Palestinian Legislative Council PLC.
Unfortunately, neither the President nor his
office is held accountable to the PLC. This
enabled a number of corrupted public sector
employees to seek refuge from prosecution in the
haven provided by the President’s Office.
HE added that despite this
amendment, the President’s Office continues to
extensively monopolize full mandate of the
security system.
Mr. Harb shed light on the basic
issue presented in the report; mainly, the
absence of a clear and balanced separation
between the branches of government. There is no
clear separation in the powers mandated to the
President and the Prime Minister. There is no
clear phrase in the law that holds the President
accountable to the PLC. The President’s ability
to assign judges in the judiciary system had
contributed to cronyism and weakened the
independency of the judicial system in
monitoring the executive system.
Dr. Salam Fayad, previous
Minister of Finance and member of the Third Way
Party in the PLC, demanded a change in the
nature of the political system as the basis for
revising the mandates assigned to each branch.
He also asserted that each branch should be
accountable, transparent, and integrate in
fulfilling its mission.
Dr. Ayman Daraghmah, member of
the Reform and Change List in the PLC, thanked
AMAN for its role in combating corruption in the
Palestinian society. He stressed the importance
of making the judicial system more accountable,
particularly the work of the Attorney General’s
Office in which corruption cases are not dealt
with in an efficient manner. He also noted that
AMAN will be producing two additional reports
that deal with the mandates and accountability
of the legislative and judicial systems.
Due to the importance of
building an accountable and transparent
Palestinian political system, the participants
recommended the organization of a working day in
which all three reports are discussed
comprehensively. |